I like consistency in politics.  It's a rare quality, but I like to see politicians have a certain philosophy that guides their decisions.  The only thing I value more than consistency is honesty.  I might not agree with a politician's decision, but if he or she can honestly explain their rationale for making a decision, there's  a good chance they'll earn my respect (but probably not my vote).  That's why I find the opposition to the e-verify bill so troubling.

     Many senators  and representatives claim to oppose the e-verify bill because it will place additional rules on businesses.  I don't agree, but as someone who supports a business-friendly environment, I could respect that perspective...if it were consistent.  The problem is that there is often blatant inconsistency with little attempt to reconcile the sudden change in thinking, which leads me to believe certain senators and representatives are liars who challenge their constituent's intelligence.

     If you look at those who oppose e-verify, many of them are the same people who favor higher taxes, additional rules and regulations, and a substantially higher minimum or living wage.  The last time I checked, increasing expenses and adding red tape were bad for business.  Why are some concerned about the rather small inconvenience e-verify would cause, while they are increasing labor costs and narrowing profits?

     I suspect that many of these politicians support open borders and lack the nerve to say so.  If that's the case, add a lack of courage (and common sense) to their list of deficiencies.