Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has reportedly decided not to run for re-election in 2010.  Whether you are a resident of Alaska or not, this is bad news.  This decision affects not only Alaskans, but possibly, citizens all over the United States. 

     Despite criticism, Sarah Palin seems to be popular in her home state.  I'm sure many of her constituents are disappointed they won't be able to vote for her in November 2010.  On a national level, the news is even worse, since some have speculated that her decision is related to Presidential ambitions.  By not running, it would give her more time to campaign, without having to endure criticism from those who feel she is ignoring her responsibilities in Alaska.  

     My concern is that she does indeed run, she becomes the darling of the social conservatives, then trounces candidates who might have actually had a decent shot of being successful against Barack Obama in 2012.  Sarah Palin will be a formidable candidate in a Republican primary, but she doesn't seem to have the broad appeal that would make her a successful presidential candidate in November of 2012.

     Social conservatives are going to cringe at this next statement, but the best thing the GOP could do is nominate a fiscally conservative moderate in 2012.  The individual would be a palatable choice for swing voters, and would increase the likelihood of a Republican in the White House.  Conservatives might find not like this strategy, but your typical moderate Republican is a lot more conservative than Barack Obama.  

     The most important goal for Republicans is to regain the Presidency.  The best chance we have is to support a more moderate voice.  If you disagree with this idea and insist on supporting a candidate who will appeal to the religious right, please consider Mike Huckabee or Tim Pawlenty rather than Sarah Palin.  We can't afford another weak Presidential candidate in 2012.