New York Governor David Patterson has some big decisions to make.  Besides the normal day-to-day challenges and the economic crisis hitting the U.S., the Governor must appoint someone to replace Hilary Clinton in the Senate.   Caroline Kennedy has come out of the woodwork and made her interest in the position known.  Some have argued that she isn't qualified, while others are unhappy with the sense of entitlement displayed by her and supporters who feel the Kennedy name should grant admission to the Senate.  Since I believe a diversity of backgrounds is beneficial to the Senate, I won't dispute her qualifications.  My problem is with individuals who feel that Kennedys deserve preferential treatment.

     There are several potential candidates for the appointment, yet we don't hear much about them because they have the wrong last name.  I was beginning to think that Caroline Kennedy's appointment was a done deal, then I read an article that made a lot of sense.  It mentions the possibility of Governor Patterson appointing a "caretaker" to represent New York until a formal election in 2010.  The "caretaker" would be a knowledgeable individual who would represent the state, but not be interested in running for reelection in 2010.  This would allow the citizens' voices to be heard during the next General Election without providing an unfair advantage to those who are politically connected.  Some possible appointees mentioned are Bill Clinton, Mario Cuomo, and Bob Kerry.

     Whether you agree or disagree with the potential caretakers, it would take a small amount of favoritism out of the equation.  It would help level the playing field slightly for 2010 and ensure competent representation in the mean time.  As an outside observer, I'm hoping the Governor sends a message to those who expect that there family name is all they need.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081231/ap_on_re_us/ny_senate_seat